The NCIS Model: How Democracies Collapse Without a Coup - Trump isn’t the system. He’s the screen.
While the world focuses on Trump’s chaos, something far more dangerous is unfolding behind him:
A system that doesn't abolish democracy, it simulates it.
That doesn’t silence dissent, it overloads it.
That doesn’t stage a coup, it reprograms institutions from within.
This essay introduces the NCIS Model.
A strategic framework to understand how democracies erode structurally, under the appearance of legality and order.
This is not about Trump. It’s about the system that uses him as cover.
NCIS Essay - The Illusion of Normalcy
Donald Trump is back - and with him, the old circus.
Once again, scandals erupt, absurd statements make headlines, and rage is theatrically staged.
He insults opponents, confuses world leaders, and talks about airports in the American Revolution.
The public laughs or is appalled. But it does what it has always done:
It fixates on the man. And ignores the system.
But that is precisely the point:
Trump was never the center of power. Trump was, and is, its stage design.
Not the architect, but the attraction. Not the puppeteer, but the amplifier.
And while all cameras are trained on him, others are working in the background on something far more dangerous than any insult, tweet, or tantrum:
The reprogramming of democratic systems from within.
What appears to be chaos follows a structure.
And what looks like personal incompetence is, in fact, functional:
Distract. Overload. Polarize. Hollow out.
We are not witnessing personal failure.
We are witnessing the professionalization of democratic erosion . Without tanks, without a state of emergency.
A political operating system compatible with elections, but incompatible with democratic oversight.
There is a pattern. And it has a name:
NCIS - an analytical framework.
Four axes that do not abolish democracy, but erode it from the inside.
And it's already running.
In the United States. In real time.
With Trump as the loudspeaker and a system behind him that has been waiting for someone exactly like him.
The Model: NCIS as an Analytical Tool
What we are witnessing is a new form of control.
Not overtly authoritarian, not openly illegal, but functionally hollowed out.
A hybrid regime that uses democratic appearances to disable democratic mechanisms.
This system can be analyzed.
It follows four structural axes - four parallel strategies that reinforce each other and turn any democracy into a simulation of itself:
• N - Nation Isolated
• C - Control of Cognition
• I - Institutional Fusion
• S - Strategic Destabilization
Together, they form: NCIS.
The model shows how authoritarian dynamics operate: openly, visibly, often disguised as exceptions or peculiarities.
It’s about systemic patterns that gain power through repetition, whether centrally coordinated or not.
And most importantly:
NCIS is not a conspiracy theory.
It assumes no master plan, no shadow government, no global plot.
What it describes is the convergence of functional interests:
Capital, ideology, platform dynamics, executive power.
It’s not the unity of actors that matters – but the alignment of effects:
The expansion of power, the erosion of oversight, the hollowing out of democratic institutions.
NCIS is adaptive.
It doesn’t require specific people, parties, or ideologies.
It can manifest as religious fundamentalism, libertarianism, right-wing nationalism, or radical neoliberalism – as long as the four axes are in play.
NCIS is not a theory about Trump.
It is a lens to understand what is forming behind him.
N - Nation Isolated
The first axis of NCIS targets internal national isolation. It doesn’t separate a country from the world. It isolates from democratic feedback loops.
Multilateral institutions, international treaties, transnational checks in functioning democracies, these are not obstacles, but counterweights.
Weakening or exiting them doesn’t just reduce international engagement, it eliminates external accountability.
And that is precisely the goal.
During Trump’s second term, this strategy has been radicalized:
• Withdrawal from the WHO. Not based on science, but staged politically, but as a symbol of “national sovereignty” in a time of global health crisis.
• NATO contributions were blocked, diplomatic ties frozen as spectacle. Europe was branded a burden, while alliances with autocrats were openly cultivated: Orbán, Putin, Modi, Bukele.
• Withdrawal from climate agreements was no longer justified even with economic rationale, but purely with a claim to exclusive national authority.
This decoupling from the world is not a side effect.
It creates new space for domestic authority.
Because without international standards, there is no external review, not for environmental policy, not for elections, not for human rights or constitutional violations.
What gets branded “America First” is, in truth: Democracy Last. At least in verifiable form.
“Nation Isolated” doesn’t mean isolationism, it means decoupling.
From responsibility.
From commitment.
From anything beyond the executive’s reach.
A country that deliberately removes itself from the world removes itself above all from:
the democratic gaze from the outside.
C – Control of Cognition
Democracy depends on an informed public.
NCIS doesn’t attack that through censorship, but through fragmentation, emotional saturation, and algorithmic radicalization.
Control over thought doesn't begin by banning content - it begins by replacing it with resonance.
Not: “What is true?”
But: “What feels right?”
Not: Consensus.
But: Outrage.
During Trump’s second term, this axis was pushed to its limit:
• Government websites were cleansed: Terms like climate change, LGBT, equity vanished – not by law, but by word processor.
• Media are no longer treated as the fourth estate, but as the enemy: “Enemy of the People” – a phrase pulled straight from totalitarian lexicons – became government rhetoric.
• Platforms like X (formerly Twitter) deliberately amplified radical content. Elon Musk provided the infrastructure: paid verification for far-right trolls, the dismantling of content moderation, and algorithmic boosting of disinformation.
What was once a space for public discourse is now a digital warzone.
To control perception, you don’t need facts – you need frames, emotion, and repetition.
The confusion is not a side effect – it’s the goal.
When no one is certain whether an election, a pandemic, or a law is real, orientation becomes a partisan identity. And facts become optional.
Truth loses its authority and power takes its place.
Control of Cognition doesn’t aim to convince people.
It only needs them to stop believing anything at all.
Because once that happens,
every lie is as powerful as the truth –
and every political strategy becomes immune to contradiction.
I – Institutional Fusion
Democracies rely on institutional tension:
Legislature, executive, and judiciary. Separate, self-limiting, interdependent.
NCIS dissolves this tension without visibly dismantling the structure.
The facade remains.
But the functions are fused.
Institutional Fusion means the separation of powers exists only on paper, but not in reality.
In practice:
• Project 2025, a blueprint from ultra-conservative think tanks, became operational during Trump’s second term:
Ministries were filled with ideological loyalists, not experts.
The Department of Justice ceased to act independently and began shielding presidential interests.
• Appointments were made based on loyalty, not competence:
Those who pledged allegiance to the agenda got positions, regardless of qualification.
Those who resisted were removed or publicly discredited.
Oversight became opportunity. Loyalty became currency.
• Merger of state and party:
Executive agencies and campaign organizations became indistinguishable.
The state became a tool of reelection.
The Justice Department became a sword wielded against political opponents.
This strategy isn’t new – but it's never been deployed this systematically:
From purging civil servants and dismantling scientific institutions, to neutralizing watchdog bodies. All done within formal legal limits.
There is no dictatorship, just a state that has lost its independence.
Institutions no longer serve the law, they serve the agenda.
And that makes them more dangerous than overt repression.
Because as long as courts convene, ministries operate, and agencies send official letters,
the public assumes: the system is still working.
But in truth, it works in only one direction:
Upward. Toward centralized power.
That is the core of Institutional Fusion.
S – Strategic Destabilization
Democracies thrive on stability:
Predictable procedures, peaceful transitions, limited agitation.
NCIS reverses that principle.
It creates instability, not as a crisis, but as a strategy.
Crises aren’t avoided - they are engineered.
Because whoever controls the chaos also controls the solution.
And whoever permanently creates exceptions can permanently claim exemption.
The mechanics:
• Assaults on NGOs and universities:
Civil rights organizations were labeled “enemies of the state.”
Research institutions were defunded or ideologically purged.
Expertise was replaced with opinion. Dissent with loyalty tests.
• Legislation by emergency:
Migration, climate policy, public health. Everything became a crisis.
The response: emergency decrees, fast-track laws, executive orders.
• Deliberate escalation of rhetoric:
Opposition became treason.
Democrats = traitors.
Journalists = liars.
Bureaucrats = the deep state.
This wasn’t overheated language. It was calibrated.
• Withdrawal of state responsibility:
In disasters, aid was delayed or ideologically filtered.
Loyalty determined support.
Security became a reward or a weapon.
This strategy is brutally efficient:
When nothing works, those who promise control gain it.
And when the rule of law responds to crisis with repression instead of reason,
it becomes a tool of escalation, not restraint.
Strategic Destabilization means:
Permanent outrage replaces rational oversight.
Citizens lose trust in orde and cling to those who scream “order” the loudest.
It is no coincidence that Trump’s most intense mobilization always came
when democratic systems were most vulnerable.
He doesn’t need the crisis.
He is the crisis on demand.
The Amplifier - Trump as a Tool
Donald Trump is not an anomaly, he is a function.
He is not leading the transformation of the state because he has a plan. He’s doing it because he is perfectly suited for the role.
His narcissism makes him manipulable.
His obsession with attention makes him loud.
His impulsiveness makes him unpredictable, but always media-effective.
He is not the architect but the amplifier of a system designed by others and he is used like an algorithm uses a meme.
How this works:
• While think tanks like the Heritage Foundation prepare personnel infrastructure behind the scenes,
Trump delivers the chaos that conceals the institutional restructuring.
• While billionaire networks engineer tax policy and deregulation,
Trump screams about “wokeness” and “election fraud.”
• While the judiciary is being staffed with loyalists,
Trump distracts with talk about swimsuits, golf tournaments, and TV ratings.
The result is a perfect effect:
Attention stays on the spectacle – power shifts into structure.
What makes this so dangerously effective is that his cognitive instability is a feature, not a flaw.
When Trump contradicts himself in interviews, confuses names and places, or reinvents past events, he seems like a buffoon to many.
And that very perception protects him from being seen as deliberately dangerous.
He appears erratic and is therefore underestimated.
Meanwhile, others implement long-term, structured agendas. Quietly and efficiently.
Trump’s mental disorganization, his confabulations, sentence fragments, mental leaps are the perfect camouflage for a process far too organized to be accidental.
He is the show, not the plan.
And that’s precisely why he was, from the very beginning, the ideal candidate.
NCIS Goes Global - The Authoritarian Export Model
NCIS isn’t uniquely American.
It’s an adaptable operating system now running internationally under different guises, with similar results.
The method is always the same:
Preserve institutions, change their function.
Create crisis, offer control.
Retain democratic appearance – erase democratic substance.
Hungary (Viktor Orbán)
Orbán pioneered Institutional Fusion in full form:
• The media landscape was consolidated into a right-wing ownership cartel
• The judiciary was reformed; the constitutional court brought in line
• NGOs were demonized, universities restructured (see: Central European University)
• EU membership was exploited while shielding Hungary from external enforcement
Orbán calls it “illiberal democracy” – a euphemism for permanent NCIS.
Israel (Benjamin Netanyahu)
Netanyahu’s judicial overhaul shows how Strategic Destabilization works hand-in-hand with institutional conflict:
• His government tried to strip Israel’s Supreme Court of its authority – in a deeply polarized society
• The attempted power grab sparked mass protests and international warnings
• Simultaneous media campaigns targeted “the left,” judges, and journalists
• The government remained operational – but was decoupled from accountability
India (Narendra Modi)
Modi’s government leverages Control of Cognition like few others:
• Algorithmic polarization via WhatsApp, Facebook, and TV
• Hindu nationalism embedded as national identity
• Critical media marginalized or shut down
• Muslim minorities systematically discriminated against; dissent criminalized
Democracy still exists –
but only as a stage for majoritarian authoritarianism.
Argentina (Javier Milei)
Milei is a prototype of Strategic Destabilization through shock therapy:
• Mass layoffs in the public sector
• Deregulation without transition plans
• Deliberate dismantling of social infrastructure – under the banner of “freedom”
• Flooding the public with pseudo-anarchy while centralizing real power
Chaos is the goal. Not a Failure.
NCIS isn’t tied to Trump, nor to any one party or ideology.
It works as libertarianism, nationalism, religious fundamentalism, or populism, as long as the four structural axes are in motion.
What unites these regimes is this:
They generate the illusion of democracy – while building authoritarian reality beneath it.
What NCIS Is Not & Why That Makes It So Dangerous
NCIS is not a master plan.
It is not a conspiracy, not a secret cabal, not centrally orchestrated.
It doesn’t require backroom deals.
It only needs a functional alignment of interests.
The system doesn’t emerge because everyone wants the same thing, but because different actors benefit from the same shift.
• Billionaires want tax cuts.
• Ideologues want cultural transformation.
• Platform owners want engagement.
• Authoritarians want control.
• Politicians want reelection.
These interests converge in a field of power that doesn’t abolish democracy, it unlocks its safeguards through continuous outrage, loyalty economics and structural manipulation.
NCIS is a pattern.
It isn’t orchestrated, it unfolds.
And that’s precisely what makes it so dangerous.
Because there’s no obvious villain to confront.
No smoking gun. No manifesto.
Just a slowly mutating system.
The grand illusion is this:
If it’s not a dictatorship, it can’t be authoritarian.
If it was elected, it must be democratic.
If it looks like a democracy, it still is one.
And here lies the risk:
If we only recognize the threat when tanks are rolling, we miss the real mechanism:
Internal restructuring. In real time. Without a coup, without bans, without noise.
NCIS works because it looks like democracy.
And because even when it’s recognized, it is not taken seriously enough.
The New Democratic Facade
The great deception is the simulation of normalcy.
Elections are held.
Parliaments meet.
Laws are passed.
Journalists report.
Courts rule.
And yet:
Decision-making is redirected.
Oversight is diluted.
Truth is devalued.
Public discourse is polarized.
The system functions - but only upward.
NCIS is not an emergency, it is a permanent condition pretending to be a temporary glitch.
A self-replicating political machine, unbothered by criticism and immune to institutional correction.
Democracy does not die with a bang. iIt dies with a quiet consensus of perceived safety.
With the belief that as long as elections are held, democracy is intact, with the reflex to dismiss warnings as exaggerations, the most dangerous reaction to NCIS isn’t denial and it’s minimization.
The smirk at Trump.
The shrug at structural erosion.
The indifference to how systems function, as long as the show goes on.
But democracy doesn’t need spectacle to be destroyed. It only needs one thing:
For people to stop noticing that it’s already become a stage set.
And so, this text ends not with a plea, but with a diagnosis:
What still looks like democracy is already its replica.
© Citation & Usage
The NCIS Model is an original analytical framework developed by Miriam Ferfers (2025).
If you cite, quote, or reference this work, please credit accordingly:
“Miriam Ferfers – The NCIS Model: How Democracies Collapse Without a Coup” (2025)
Unauthorized reproduction, modification, or republication is not permitted
Stay connected
If this essay helped you see smething more clearly, feel free to share it and follow for future essays on systemic manipulation, cognitive warfare, and democratic resilience.
Disclaimer
This essay is a structural political analysis. It does not offer medical claims, psychological diagnoses, or personal accusations. All assessments are based on documented political behavior, institutional actions and verifiable developments. Interpretations are protected under the right to free expression and serve the public interest.
This is quite impressive, as it seems to me that you’ve developed an effective lens through which to assess and understand both faux democracies (US, Hungary, India, etc) & those that have been sliding in that direction (including Canada, as well as much of the “free” world).
Even while I sense that our 🇨🇦 PM Carney is both well-meaning & intelligent, that he possesses the Values as described in his book of the same name, I am fearful that a future government (or his tbh) might use the new “National Interest” project fast-tracking to govern illiberally — acting as another crack through which NCIS can grow insidiously.
I really appreciate you sharing this, Miriam!
Interesting take – I’d actually say we’re aiming at the same target from different angles.
I’m curious: Which part of the NCIS model doesn’t track for you?